Author: Eric Bergman

Anchor, Alaska cluster uploaded

The Anchor cluster is named for Anchor Point at the western end of the
Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. The cluster spans the Cook Inlet. It includes
events in two depth ranges, events shallower than ~25 km, mainly along
the coast of the Alaskan mainland on the west side of Cook Inlet and
events in the range 30-65 km on the eastern side of Cook Inlet, and
beneath the western coast of the Kenai Peninsula. Many events are small
and only observed to regional distances, but all events are observed to
at least 5° epicentral distance. All events have depth control from
near-source and local-distance arrival times.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Simav-Gediz, Turkey cluster uploaded

The Simav-Gediz cluster is named for two significant earthquakes in
central Turkey, the 7.2 Mw Gediz earthquake on March 28, 1970, and the
5.9 Mw Simav earthquake on May 19, 2011. Initial work on these clusters
was done by Ezgi Karasözen. The cluster includes both sequences as well
as other well-recorded events in the vicinity. All events were recorded
to at least 10° epicentral distance and most were recorded
teleseismically. The seismograph network in this area was sparse before
about 2007, but quite dense afterwards, so all events after that time
have depth control from near-source and local-distance readings. Depth
control for earlier events is a mixture of local-distance readings,
teleseismic depth phases, and, in 17 cases lacking any other constraint
(all prior to 1977), a default depth sampled from a probability density
function that was based on the distribution of events with depth
constraint. The probability density function has a peak at 9 km and a
spread of 2.5 km. Sampled depths are required to be within 2-sigma of
the mean (i.e., 4-14 km).

Filed under: Uncategorized

MLOC v13.0.2 and User’s Manual released

The distribution of mloc v13.0.2 was posted today. It can be downloaded from https://seismo.com/mloc/distribution/. The accompanying Desktop User’s Manual can be downloaded from https://seismo.com/mloc/desktop-manual/.

Due to extensive changes to the source code since the last distribution, cohesion between the current version of mloc and the User’s Manual is not as complete as I would like. I will be glad to be informed of places in the Manual that need further work.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Oran, Algeria cluster uploaded

The Oran cluster is named for the city of Oran on the Mediterranean
coast of Algeria. It includes a few events across the border in coastal
Morocco. The cluster contains four events with magnitude > 5, the
largest being the 5.5 Mw event on June 6, 2008. Most events were
observed to teleseismic distances but some smaller events that were
recorded only to near-regional distances were retained to improve the
azimuthal coverage and statistical power of the location calibration.
All events have depth control, from near-source or local-distance
readings, or in a several cases, a waveform modeling study or
teleseismic depth phases.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Afar, Ethiopia cluster uploaded

The Afar cluster is named for the Afar region of Ethiopia, Eritrea and
Djibouti. The cluster occupies the northern part of what has been termed
the Danakil or Arrata microplate. Much of the seismicity has occurred in
swarms associated with volcanic activity. The cluster includes five
events with magnitude greater than 6.0, in swarms that occurred in April
1969 and August 1989. All but five events in the cluster were recorded
at teleseismic distances. All events have depth control from near-source
and local-distance readings or (more frequently than usual) teleseismic
depth phases. Location calibration is based mainly on a seismic swarm
that was well-instrumented with a temporary network from November 2007
to February 2009, and included events large enough to be recorded at
teleseismic distances, which established the necessary connectivity with
events that lack local observations.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Sumba, Indonesia cluster uploaded

The Sumba cluster is named for the island of Sumba in the Lesser Sunda
Islands of eastern Indonesia. The cluster is restricted to events with
constrained focal depths of 40 km or less since 2008. Earlier events
lack station coverage to adequately link them to the more recent
earthquakes. The largest earthquake has magnitude 5.8 Mw, on February
21, 2022. With one exception (depth constrained by teleseismic depth
phases) all events have depth constraint from near-source or
local-distance readings. Many small events that were recorded only to
near-regional distances are retained to improve the statistical power of
the location calibration.

Filed under: Uncategorized

St. Lucia, Windward Islands cluster uploaded

The Lucia cluster is named for the island of St. Lucia in the Windward
Islands. It includes events near Barbados and St. Vincent and the
Grenadines. Station coverage is fairly good since 2008. Many events are
recorded only locally but there are useful amounts of data at far
regional and teleseismic distances. The largest event is 5.7 mb on
August 12, 1987. All events have depth control, mostly from near-source
and local-distance readings, but several events are constrained in depth
by teleseismic depth phases.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Sparta, North Carolina cluster uploaded

The Sparta cluster is named for the city of Sparta in northwestern North
Carolina. It covers a rather broad area and includes events in eastern
Tennessee, western Virginia and southernmost West Virginia. The cluster
is based on a 5.1 Mw earthquake on August 9, 2020 very close to Sparta.
The Sparta earthquake is remarkable for its shallow depth (with various
estimates in the 2-4 km range) and the observation of surface faulting.
It has a depth of 4 km in the calibrated relocation, based on arrivals
at local distance, but a shallower depth cannot be ruled out. The
cluster as a whole is at quite shallow depths, with only a single event
as deep as 10 km. It is quite likely that many of the events are mining
blasts. Most events have magnitudes in the 2-3 range. The distribution
of seismic stations is very good and the location calibration is very
strong, with an uncertainty of ~500 m for the hypocentroid at the 90%
confidence level. However the calibrated epicenter, like most other
location-based estimates that were reported, is a few km south of the
surface faulting. This could be a consequence of lateral heterogeneity
in the region. Seismograph stations to the southeast are on the coastal
plain, while the rest are in the Appalachian Mountains.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Chardon, Ohio cluster uploaded

The Chardon cluster is named for the city of Chardon, Ohio. The cluster
covers the northeastern corner of Ohio along the southern bank of Lake
Erie, and includes some events in western Pennsylvania. The largest
event is a 5.3 mb event on January 31, 1986; no other event is larger
than 3.9 mb. Most events are recorded only to regional distances. All
events have depth control from near-source or local-distance readings.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Greenback, Tennessee cluster uploaded

The Greenback cluster is named for town of Greenback in eastern
Tennessee. The seismicity is of low magnitude and scattered over most of
eastern Tennessee, with some events over the border in western North
Carolina and northern Georgia. The largest events are a 4.3 mb event on
December 12, 2018 and a 4.1 Mw event on May 10, 2025. The seismic
network in this area expanded greatly around 2012, but earlier events in
the region are not well connected to those recorded in the past 15
years. Most events are recorded only to regional distances. All events
have depth control from near-source and local-distance readings.

Filed under: Uncategorized